zim
Childish Geek
Posts: 75
|
Post by zim on Jul 1, 2008 2:58:25 GMT -5
Worry noted, Ramses. How about I send any pertinent info via pm at the Org instead?
All this worry about spies and an attack by the Caliph is rather unsettling. I'd say I longed for simpler times with relatively straightforward wars, but the war against the Shah has stalled in such a way as to make even that seem unattractive.
Noticed some rather suspicion activity on my own turn. I started it neutral with the Shah, but he did not share any allies with me. Best I can figure is someone offered him an alliance that he accepted on his turn, prompting a ceasefire. Then he sent a diplomat to the player to cancel the alliance so I wouldn't be able to check on my turn.
Since as far as I recall all the factions I've made in-game alliances with are in the CoF I'll assume the person will see this. If the person is a loyal member of the CoF they should stop, since every fort siege lifted automatically this way slows me down and makes it tougher to help Ramses. If the person is not, then they should still stop, since I'm guessing this would violate the "no exploits" Phonics added a while back.
|
|
|
Post by barcamartin on Jul 4, 2008 15:23:35 GMT -5
Seems I missed quite a bit during my two weeks abroad.
Sucks that EF had access to this forum. As if your position wasn't difficult enough Ramses.
|
|
|
Post by ramsesiicp on Jul 6, 2008 11:14:12 GMT -5
Well, since it's all out in the open, obviously I lied about attacking Ferret Castle, but I did it in a hilarious cause. Frankly it's astonishing that I'm still alive. I had, at one point, a grand total of 2 family members, 4 provinces, and 10 companies of soldiers, only 5-6 of those not garbage troops. Now I have considerably more of all of those things. If EF has a spy one of them is grossly incompetent. The Rajputs are withdrawing from the Coalition and next year will be renouncing the alliances which might allow exploitation of the system. So, err, yeah, send anything via PM Z.
|
|